Monday, July 25, 2005

Trying , and failing, to change the subject

PRESIDENT BUSH'S new Supreme Court nominee was a historic first after all: the first to be announced on TV dead center in prime time, smack in the cross hairs of "I Want to Be a Hilton." It was also one of the hastiest court announcements in memory, abruptly sprung a week ahead of the White House's original timetable. The agenda of this rushed showmanship - to change the subject in Washington - could not have been more naked. But the president would have had to nominate Bill Clinton to change this subject.

When a conspiracy is unraveling, and it's every liar and his lawyer for themselves, the story takes on a momentum of its own. When the conspiracy is, at its heart, about the White House's twisting of the intelligence used to sell the American people a war - and its desperate efforts to cover up that flimflam once the W.M.D. cupboard proved bare and the war went south -- the story will not end until the war really is in its "last throes."
Those are the first two paragraphs of a NY Times op ed by Frank Rich that is well worth reading in its entirety. Among other things, Rich suggests that AG Alberto Gonzales' handling of the Wilson-Plame issue has cost him a Supreme Court appointment.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home