Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Gay marriage not priority for Americans

Ron Brownstein's column in the LA Times (Gay marriage vote only serves to divide nation) is about the national debate on gay marriage, revived by George W.Bush and the Republicans this week. But the conclusions apply to Wisconsin, as well:

Whatever else Americans may think about gay marriage, few consider it one of the country's most serious moral challenges. By elevating it so prominently, this week's debate is likely to deepen the sense that Washington [Read the GOP majority in Madison] is fixated on the preoccupations of ideological minorities while slighting most Americans' day-to-day concerns.

That danger is captured in a national survey ... by the liberal Center for American Progress. The survey, conducted in late February, underscores the importance of religion and morality in Americans' lives. Nearly three-quarters of those polled said they prayed at least once a day, and just over half said they attended religious services at least once a week. Concern that the country had lost its moral compass was widespread. Survey results.

But the survey demonstrated again that the moral issues people worried about most in their daily lives were very different from the ones dominating political debate. The survey asked Americans to name the most serious moral crisis in America today. Atop the list, 28% cited "kids not raised with the right values." Next came corruption in government and business, followed by greed and materialism, people too focused on themselves, and too much sex and violence in the media. Only 3% named abortion and homosexuality as the nation's top moral challenge. Even among those who attend religious services most often, just 6% picked abortion and homosexuality.

These findings challenge the values agenda of both parties. They do point to priorities different from the conservative focus on gay rights and abortion. But they also suggest liberals don't hit the mark either when they try to signal their values simply by describing causes, such as reducing poverty, as moral imperatives.

"There is a deep hunger to get away from religion being associated solely with the antiabortion and anti-gay marriage agenda — there is a deep public yearning for an alternative moral vision," said John Halpin, a senior fellow and opinion analyst at the Center for American Progress. "But it's not just talking about the left's issues and tagging the word 'moral' on it. You have to talk to people at a personal and family level about what faith and values mean."

Public policy can't easily reach all of these anxieties. But it can address some of them.
CORY LIEBMANN: Bush listens to Rove, not Laura.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home