In the belly of the beast:
Bruce Murphy on the Journal Sentinel
How the Journal Sentinel decides to cover -- and not cover -- the news. After three years on the inside, a reporter tells the real story.
That's how Milwaukee Magazine teases the story by its new editor, Bruce Murphy, in its July edition.
Here's how Jim Romenesko describes it on Poynter online, a journalism site:
THURSDAY, JUNE 16, 2005
What can happen when a newspaper hires a city mag writer
That writer might return to the magazine and tell readers what goes on inside the daily's newsroom. Bruce Murphy was recently rehired by Milwaukee Magazine after working three years at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. At the paper, he writes, "top editors drive the agenda, middle editors worry about their dictates and reporters take turns being confused and demoralized. Against all odds, good stories -- and an occasional great one -- get written, but you can't help but wonder why the paper can't be better. The answer begins in the chaotic mess of the newsroom." Link to story
It's the Milwaukee connection in action. Jim Romenesko once wrote the "Pressroom Confidential" column for Milwaukee Magazine, reporting on inside goings-on in newsroom over at 4th and State. He's since moved on to internet fame, writing about the media online for The Poynter Institute, a school for journalists, future journalists, and teachers of journalists. He also has his own site, the Obscure Store and Reading Room, where he collects offbeat stories.
This will keep newsroom buzzing for a few days.
4 Comments:
The Journal Sentinel's coverage of the school vouchers controversy has been ideological in the extreme. On the basis of Bruce's description of how things work at the Journal Sentinel, I have a prediction for Friday's paper:
There will be prominent coverage of today's letter from the Alliance for Choices in Education, aka Fuller and Mitchell, to Superintendent Burmaster. (posted on thewheelerreport.com.) The letter tries to spin reaction to the newspaper's current series on voucher schools. It also disingenuously attempts to give cover to those voucher proponents who have resisted any kind of meaningful accountability or responsible governance for years.
There may be a mercy quote in the last paragraph from a public school educator. Someone who is scrutinized by the press and conservative pundits in ways unthinkable to private religious schools.
It's too bad Bruce didn't have anything to say directly about JS coverage (that's a pun) of vouchers.
Imagine what that paper would be like if the dead wood got trimmed, top to bottom. Instead, we settle for conservative mediocrity. Dullsville.
Murphy's story was absolutely boring--and I take full credit for being sucker enough to read the whole thing.
IMHO, the Journal's problems are: 1) the reported Federal indictments of a Boston (?) newspaper's circ. execs for FRAUD (strikes really close to home;) and 2) the free-fall in circulation suffered by MJ-S and all other print news outlets.
These little items most likely occupied the front burners of J-S management during the last 15 months (more or less.)
Murphy did not get God-status, nor was he worshipped by other reporters, editors, or readers--so he loosed a rant which could have been written by any teenage girl after a jilt.
Ha. The first poster's prediction is wrong. Friday's paper didn't cover Susan Mitchell's letter on vouchers.
Instead, Susan Mitchell had her own full length op-ed piece on the opinion page in Sunday's Crossroads section.
Now that's independence.
Post a Comment
<< Home