Bush goes nucular
WashPost:
Bush Calls For New Nuclear PlantsAnd what will become of the deadly nuclear waste that's generated? We'll leave that for the same future generations that are expected to pay off Bush's trillions in debt.
President Talks Of Environmental Benefits, Safety
LIMERICK, Pa., May 24 -- President Bush promoted nuclear power Wednesday as part of his answer to energy and environmental problems as more companies consider taking advantage of government incentives to build the nation's first new nuclear plant in decades.
In the shadow of twin giant cooling towers, Bush said that his plan to expand nuclear power would curb emissions contributing to global warming and would provide an "abundant and plentiful" alternative to limited energy sources. Bush called the nuclear sector an "overregulated industry" and pledged to work to make it more feasible to build reactors.
"Nuclear power helps us protect the environment. And nuclear power is safe," he said to loud applause from workers at the Limerick Generating Station, about 40 miles from Philadelphia. He added: "For the sake of economic security and national security, the United States must aggressively move forward with construction of nuclear power plants. Other nations are."
Fortunately, he's not in charge any more. What he says is largely irrelevant, unless he can order some agency to secretly build nukes as part of the war on terrorism. (Maybe I shouldn't give him any ideas. He doesn't read this blog, but I know Rove does.)
Grist, the online environmental magazine, calls him Nuke Skytalker:
Bush pushes nuclear power at home and abroad
President Bush has embraced nuclear power with a vengeance (on us?). On a tour of a nucular ... er, nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania yesterday, Bush called for the construction of new nuke plants to help curb greenhouse-gas emissions. "Let's quit the debate about whether greenhouse gases are caused by mankind or by natural causes; let's just focus on technologies that deal with the issue," he said. Thanks to a new raft of nuke subsidies Bush signed into law last year, 16 companies have expressed interest in building new plants, though none has submitted a formal application. Exelon Corp.'s president has said his company has "no intention" of building a new nuke plant until there's a solution to the problem of where to put nuclear waste. What a fuddy-duddy! Also yesterday, Bush signed on to a treaty with the European Union, Russia, Japan, India, China, and South Korea to spend $5.9 billion attempting to build the world's first nuclear fusion reactor in France. Fusion technology has never succeeded, but like victory in Iraq, it's always been just around the corner.
2 Comments:
If there is a solution to the nuclear waste issue, aside from finding a way to keep it sealed and out of the environment for 250,000 years, those pretty green countries have kept it to themselves. Someone should tell the US nuclear industry, which just keeps piling it up.
Is it just me, or couldn't you just hear Bush say in the style of Homer Simpson..."It's pronounced nuc-U-ler."
So Bushie is once again "calling for something" as part of our independence on foreign oil? Is anyone actually buying that? He's nothing but rhetoric...when it comes down to it, he'll always side with his buddies in the oil industry. If a town wants to build a new nuclear plant, they'll have to raise taxes or get funding from the federal government...yeah, that's not going to happen. You think he's going to convince the oil industry to build nuclear facilities? That's about the only way that will ever happen. And like Xoff said, more facilities equals more waste and nobody wants the waste in their state. Catch 22 and then some.
Post a Comment
<< Home