Lautenschlager losing key staffers
as her campaign continues to struggle
UPDATE: NICHOLS WEIGHS IN. John Nichols of the Capital Times calls on Dems to unite behind Lautenschlager this weekend. She's done a good job, he says, and has always been very popular with Democrats. Kathleen Falk should either get in or get out of the race, Nichols says. He doesn't mention whether he thinks Lautenschlager can win next year, which is the main reason many Dems think she should step aside. Nichols and others say the issue is her independence. Actually, it is her electability and what it will do to the Democratic party and progressive politics if we lose that important office. Nichols column.
UPDATE: LAUTENSCHLAGER SPIN CONTROL FALLS SHORT. Friday Xoff post
=====================================================
Beleaguered Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager, beset by problems, down in the polls, and short of cash, has another woe to add to her list -- the planned departure of two key staff members.
Lautenschlager continues to insist that she will run again and win re-election next year, all indications to the contrary. But she is about to lose both her campaign manager and her spokesman in the AG's office, and neither will be easy to replace.
In Lautenschlager's world view, polls don't matter, the money will come later, and she will be rehabilitated with the voters after personally prosecuting the high profile case against Chai Vang, charged with killing six hunters.
Lautenschlager's problems are both personal and political. A highly-publicized drunk driving arrest, complete with video, was very damaging. The way she handled it compounded the problem. And a rash of stories questioning her use of a state car added to the misery.
Those problems all pale in comparison with her diagnosis of breast cancer, followed by surgery and chemotherapy. That kind of challenge puts politics into perspective, and she was determined to do her job, illness, bald head, and all. That gutsy performance undoubtedly helped her, but did not erase the very real political problems she faces.
WisPolitics reported on an April poll, done by a number of Democratic groups, in which respondents gave her only a 23 per cent positive rating against 34 negative. (With only 5% "very positive" and 18% "very negative.")
That is starting in a pretty deep hole, although Campaign Manager Michael Murphy gave it his best spin: "As we all know, the only poll that really matters is the poll on Election Day. Peg is working towards 2006 and she is going to raise the money she needs to win."
Her fundraising up until then had been anemic, although she was predicting people would have a more positive view when they see her next report in July, covering the last six months. But there is little evidence she has raised any substantial money, and the potential entry of Kathleen Falk into the race has probably made many Democrats sit on their wallets until things become clear.
In January, Lautenschlager hired Scot Ross, a Wisconsin political veteran who had been research director last year for America Coming Together (ACT), as her communications director in the Justice Dept., to shore up that office and try to turn the corner on media coverage.
Ross is leaving, but being patient while a search for his replacement continues. He's wanted for some time to establish a non-profit research organization to help move the progressive agenda in Wisconsin, and presumably is going to do something along those lines.
Murphy, whom Lautenschlager hired this spring as campaign manager, also is looking to leave soon for another political job, as yet unspecified. Murphy has had the unenviable job of overseeing Lautenschlager's fundraising and defending her prospects.
No one is irreplaceable, of course. And nothing is insurmountable. (How about a chorus of "Climb Every Mountain"?)
But Lautenschlager faces a very steep climb. She will probably get a positive reception at the Democratic state convention in Oshkosh this weekend. But she has been in politics long enough and has enough savvy to recognize that the folks in Oshkosh are not the general electorate. Her campaign may peak in Oshkosh.
For her own sake and the sake of Wisconsin's progressives, she should take a hard, realistic look at whether she can win this race. There is no sign she has done that to date.
6 Comments:
I'm sick of reading the thoughts of this right-wing party hack and having them pass for the "left" in Wisconsin. You are a flack for Doyle and nothing else; you help right-wing Democrats and Republicans beat progressives and kill progressive issues, and nobody in the grassroots takes you seriously. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that you're supporting Joe Wineke for chair. Rammelt is the only hope of reforming this dying party!
I must agree with Bill that the Attorney General needs to take a serious look at the reality of her candidacy. Furthermore, Democrats must take an even harder look at the importance of retaining this seat. Losing this office would be devasting to the goal of simply keeping the Democratic policy of the past in place much less to affect new policy. As Democrats, we must be cognizant (sp?) of the fact that we are not living in a world inhabitated with the same mindset of the days of Gaylord Nelson or the La Follettes. I am not saying Peg cannot win, but Democrats that believe in primarys should be focusing their concentration on this race asking a simple question -- "Without gaining or keeping power, our force in democracy is nothing but the sound of voices in the wind. Is this candidate the one who will keep that power for us or is this battle already decided?" Democrats need to honestly and thoroughly ask themselves that and honestly answer on primary day.
On another topic, as a rural grassroots member I am again disturbed at the use of the term grassroots to strike out a Bill. I do not know Bill personally, but I know his work, like a great book on Gaylord Nelson, among many other political activities. Bill does not deserve that outburst. I am a progressive who would ask many members who swear to be the "good liberals" of this party to read the platform of 1932 and the rest of the New Deal years and then tell me how much of their fringe motivation is found in the bedrock of the current Democratic Party. If we wish to reform this party, and some is needed, then I suggest we remember what created this party and start there. Not pick up the left over pieces of the 60's push and keep marching to the sound of a different drum than the majority of those that identify with the Democrats.
As for the chair of this party, Joe Wineke is a strong populist with the fire, energy, and will to organize a winning team and build a new infastructure around the state. This is the most important part of that job and he will do it terrifically. See you at convention!
to anonymous #1 -- if the worst thing you can think of to say about someone is that he must be for Joe Wineke for state chair, you really should try to get out more.
The very moment Peg stumbled out of her state car lit like a cheap cigar, her viable political career was over.
Left wing, right wing means nothing when you are the states top cop, top prosecuter and you can't walk a straight line and refuse a blood test.
It's time for Peg to "do the right thing" and announce she's not running in 06.
If Peg hadn't called out Doyle on the "jobs" bill, he would've backed her on the drunk driving charge, and none of this would be happening. Tons of politicians have survived a DUI, so why not Peg? Well, either because she's a progressive or because she's a woman. Either way, she's got my vote.
Calling Bill a "right wing party hack" is not accurate and nor is it constructive.
It is interesting that within the Democratic party -- lost in the wilderness though it is -- some would divide us into camps: "Left" vs. "Right"; or "grassroots" vs "right wing political hacks."
Soon there will be nothing left but a carcass.
Democrats need to work together. We need to win some elections. To win elections, you must, by definition, have a big tent and that tent must be filled with people. Bill is a top flight political strategist. Disagree with his views but don't resort to name calling -- its not constructive.
Now, what about Peg? She has two potential opponents. Both will be extremely well funded. She won her first term by narrowly defeating a lackluster challenger. Even without the OWI arrest, state car issue, lack of fundraising and breast cancer the Republicans would have targeted her. Why? She won a close race in a state that only narrowly went to Kerry in '04.
Start with that baseline. Now, consider:
Peg has been busted for OWI. Frankly, voters might cut her some slack for getting an OWI citation -- if she handled it by: admitting she has a drinking problem and is getting help; or saying she would quit drinking; or not splitting hairs over whether drunk driving is a "crime" or a civil forfeiture. Instead, she mishandled the aftermath and what was never going to helpful (for the state's top cop -- don't forget) is turned into a bigger problem.
Peg also, as her campaign finance report will soon show, has not raised money the way she needs to. She hasn't raised it even from the likely Democratic suspects --like me -- who gave early and often to her last time. How do I know she's not raising enough? She hasn't called me or people I know who are all longtime Democratic, progressive donors.
There is also the little matter about the state car. I've always thought this was not a big deal -- but as they say -- death by a thousand paper cuts . . . .
All in all, this adds up to a worrying picture when one contemplates the re-election chances of our Attorney General. I wish it were otherwise. I have always supported Peg but even I am worried.
Recall the last time we lost the Attorney General's office in Wisconsin. We got Don Hanaway, a conservative from Green Bay. That was no picnic for progressives or for anyone who wanted to see state government fighting for regular people.
If it happens again it will be far worse.
It is bad news about Peg.
But don't shoot the messengers.
Post a Comment
<< Home